![[google staffing turnover]](http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-CM875_google_D_20081013233434.jpg)
Associated Press-  Current and former Googlers said the company is losing talent because some employees feel they can't make the same impact as the company matures. 
Concerned  a brain drain could hurt its long-term ability to compete, Google Inc.  is tackling the problem with its typical tool: an algorithm.
The  Internet search giant recently began crunching data from employee reviews and  promotion and pay histories in a mathematical formula Google says can identify  which of its 20,000 employees are most likely to quit.
Google  officials are reluctant to share details of the formula, which is still being  tested. The inputs include information from surveys and peer reviews, and  Google says the algorithm already has identified employees who felt underused,  a key complaint among those who contemplate leaving.
Applying  a complex equation to a basic human-resource problem is pure Google, a company  that made using heavy data to drive decisions one of its "Ten Golden  Rules" outlined in 2005.
Edward  Lawler, director of the Center for Effective Organizations at the 
"They  are clearly ahead of the curve, but a lot of companies are waking up to the  fact that there is a lot of modeling that can provide you with critical data on  human capital," Mr. Lawler said. 
The move  is one of a series Google has made to prevent its most promising engineers,  designers and sales executives from leaving at a time when its once-powerful  draws -- a start-up atmosphere and soaring stock price -- have been diluted by  its growing size. The data crunching supplements more traditional measures like  employee training and leadership meetings to evaluate talent.
Google's  algorithm helps the company "get inside people's heads even before they  know they might leave," said Laszlo Bock, who runs human resources for the  company.
Concerns  about a talent exodus have revived in recent weeks amid the departures of top  executives, including advertising sales boss Tim Armstrong and  display-advertising chief David Rosenblatt. Meanwhile, midlevel employees like  lead designer Doug Bowman, engineering director Steve Horowitz and  search-quality chief Santosh Jayaram continue to decamp to hot start-ups like  Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc.
Current  and former Googlers said the company is losing talent because some employees  feel they can't make the same impact as the company matures. Several said  Google provides little formal career planning, and some found the company's  human-resources programs too impersonal.
"They  need to come up with ways to keep people engaged," said Valerie  Frederickson, a 
Google  spokesman Matt Furman said the chance to contribute to "constant and often  amazing innovation" keeps employees engaged. The company is determined to  retain top product managers and engineers.
Google  wouldn't say how many people have left, but says it has managed to hang on to  its most important staffers. "We haven't seen the most critical people  leave," Mr. Bock said.
Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124269038041932531.html
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment